Directing structural change: from tools to policy

Directing structural change: from tools to policy

Download PDF 555 KB

Altenburg, Tilman / Maria Kleinz / Wilfried Lütkenhorst
Discussion Paper 24/2016

Bonn: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)

ISBN: 978-3-96021-018-4
Preis: 6 €

Structural change towards diversification and competitiveness is important to make our economies productive, wealthy and sustainable. In market economies, structural change is essentially driven by private entrepreneurs who challenge incumbents with new business ideas and take risks to implement them. While public policy cannot fully anticipate the outcomes of such market-driven search processes, it does have important roles in directing structural change: it can facilitate stakeholder processes meant to overcome coordination and information failure and thereby smooth the transformation; it can make pre-competitive investments in infrastructure and skills for the future; and it can help align structural change with broader societal objectives, such as environmental sustainability or job creation. To fulfil these roles, policymakers need to have an idea about future competitive patterns of specialisation. The challenge is to anticipate trends and facilitate action towards promising futures in ways that are as evidence-based as possible and effectively synchronised with market forces.
Our paper makes three essential contributions to addressing this challenge: (1) We identify five influential methodologies for anticipating future competitive advantages, analyse their strengths and weaknesses, and suggest ways to consolidate their most valu¬able features in one synthetic approach. (2) In doing so, we emphasise the importance of disruptive change, stemming in particular from decarbonisation as well as the digitali¬sation of economic processes and products. Such game changers are likely to affect virtually all economic sectors, thereby reducing the predictive power of methodologies that essentially extrapolate from the past. (3) We highlight the need to contextualise the various analytical tools, and caution against using them as technocratic blueprints. To be of practical use, evidence-based assessments of future competitive advantages need to be embedded into a political economy framework that takes account of both societal objectives (normative level) and implementation capabilities (institutional level).

Über den Autor

Altenburg, Tilman

Wirtschaftsgeograph

Tilman Altenburg

Weitere Expertinnen/Experten zu diesem Thema

Berger, Axel

Politikwissenschaftler 

Brandi, Clara

Ökonomin und Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Lindenberg, Nannette

Ökonomin 

Schwab, Jakob

Ökonom 

Olekseyuk, Zoryana

Ökonomin 

El-Haddad, Amirah

Ökonomin 

Zintl, Tina

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Aktuelle Publikationen

Nach dem Gipfel: G20-Afrika Kooperation auf der Suche nach Kontinuität, Einfluss und politischen Visionen

Hackenesch, Christine / Julia Leininger / Elizabeth Sidiropoulos
Die aktuelle Kolumne, 17.07.2017

Did the G20 Hamburg Summit advance 2030 Agenda implementation?

Scholz, Imme / Clara Brandi
Mitarbeiter sonstige, 13.07.2017

Successful agricultural mechanisation in sub-Saharan Africa and the significance of agricultural financing

Müller, Corinna / Christiane Ströh de Martínez / Michael Brüntrup
Briefing Paper 11/2017

Retail FDI liberalisation and the transformation of agrifood value chains in India

Hampel-Milagrosa, Aimée / Hauke Brankamp / Thomas Cremer / Alexander Haddad / Katharina Pannwitz / Franziska Wehinger / Sangeeta Agasty / Tamal Sarkar
Studies 95

What remains of the G20 Hamburg Summit?

Berger, Axel
Die aktuelle Kolumne, 10.07.2017