Directing structural change: from tools to policy

Directing structural change: from tools to policy

Download PDF 555 KB

Altenburg, Tilman / Maria Kleinz / Wilfried Lütkenhorst
Discussion Paper 24/2016

Bonn: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)

ISBN: 978-3-96021-018-4
Preis: 6 €

Structural change towards diversification and competitiveness is important to make our economies productive, wealthy and sustainable. In market economies, structural change is essentially driven by private entrepreneurs who challenge incumbents with new business ideas and take risks to implement them. While public policy cannot fully anticipate the outcomes of such market-driven search processes, it does have important roles in directing structural change: it can facilitate stakeholder processes meant to overcome coordination and information failure and thereby smooth the transformation; it can make pre-competitive investments in infrastructure and skills for the future; and it can help align structural change with broader societal objectives, such as environmental sustainability or job creation. To fulfil these roles, policymakers need to have an idea about future competitive patterns of specialisation. The challenge is to anticipate trends and facilitate action towards promising futures in ways that are as evidence-based as possible and effectively synchronised with market forces.
Our paper makes three essential contributions to addressing this challenge: (1) We identify five influential methodologies for anticipating future competitive advantages, analyse their strengths and weaknesses, and suggest ways to consolidate their most valu¬able features in one synthetic approach. (2) In doing so, we emphasise the importance of disruptive change, stemming in particular from decarbonisation as well as the digitali¬sation of economic processes and products. Such game changers are likely to affect virtually all economic sectors, thereby reducing the predictive power of methodologies that essentially extrapolate from the past. (3) We highlight the need to contextualise the various analytical tools, and caution against using them as technocratic blueprints. To be of practical use, evidence-based assessments of future competitive advantages need to be embedded into a political economy framework that takes account of both societal objectives (normative level) and implementation capabilities (institutional level).

Über den Autor

Altenburg, Tilman

Wirtschaftsgeograph

Tilman Altenburg

Weitere Expertinnen/Experten zu diesem Thema

Berger, Axel

Politikwissenschaftler 

Brandi, Clara

Ökonomin und Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Hampel-Milagrosa, Aimée

Institutional and Agricultural Economist 

Lindenberg, Nannette

Ökonomin 

Schwab, Jakob

Ökonom 

Olekseyuk, Zoryana

Ökonomin 

El-Haddad, Amirah

Ökonomin 

Zintl, Tina

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Aktuelle Publikationen

Politische Parteien: Schwachstelle der Nachhaltigkeitsarchitektur

Kloke-Lesch, Adolf
Die aktuelle Kolumne, 29.05.2017

The EU-South Africa strategic partnership: waning affection, persisting economic interests

Grimm, Sven / Christine Hackenesch
Externe Publikationen, 24.05.2017

Wie weiter mit den Wirtschaftspartnerschaftsabkommen? Gedanken zu einer vertieften EU-Afrika-Handelspartnerschaft

Brandi, Clara / Merran Hulse / Niels Keijzer
Analysen und Stellungnahmen 9/2017

Entwicklungspolitische Eckpunkte in turbulenten Zeiten: Anmerkungen im Wahljahr

Klingebiel, Stephan / Dirk Messner / Imme Scholz
Externe Publikationen, 22.05.2017

„Make biodiversity great again!“

Richerzhagen, Carmen / Marianne Alker
Die aktuelle Kolumne, 22.05.2017

Compact with Africa: fostering private long-term investment in Africa

Kappel, Robert / Birte Pfeiffer / Helmut Reisen
Discussion Paper 13/2017