Self-differentiation of countries’ responsibilities: addressing climate change through intended nationally determined contributions

Self-differentiation of countries’ responsibilities: addressing climate change through intended nationally determined contributions

Download PDF 1.0 MB

Mbeva, Kennedy Liti / Pieter Pauw
Discussion Paper 4/2016

Bonn: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)

ISBN: 978-3-88985-683-8
Preis: 6 €

As a result of the United Nations (UN) climate negotiations in Warsaw in 2013, all countries were invited to submit a climate action plan – or “Intended Nationally Determined Contribution” (INDC) – as part of the preparations for the 2015 UN climate summit in Paris (COP21). The innovation of this instrument lies in the fact that it is universal (each country formulates one) and that they are formulated “bottom-up” (countries set their own priorities and ambitions). In theory, this stimulates countries’ self-differentiation of responsibilities and capabilities to address climate change.
This paper analyses 159 INDCs on whether they advanced self-differentiation in the context of the notion of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities (CBDR-RC). The analysis focuses on aspects beyond mitigation targets, including INDC sections on fairness / equity as well as INDC content on adaptation and climate finance.
Findings are provided for three country groupings:

  • 15 “Annex I” parties, representing 42 countries (the EU, as one Party, represents 28 countries);

  • 79 least-developed countries (LDCs) and small island developing states (SIDS), given the Paris Agreement’s subtle differentiation towards these country groups;
  • 65 “Middle countries” that fit neither category: a heterogeneous mixture of pre-dominantly middle-income countries.

This paper offers two main conclusions:
First, bottom-up setting of priorities and ambitions in INDCs advanced the issue of CBDR-RC beyond mitigation to include, at least, adaptation and finance. Although Annex I countries hardly mention adaptation in their INDCs, Middle countries, and LDCs and SIDS prioritise adaptation. The latter group, in particular, included adaptation plans and strategies. Climate finance was also hardly mentioned by Annex I countries. For Middle countries, however, and for LDCs and SIDS in particular, climate finance is often a condition for undertaking mitigation and adaptation.
Second, self-differentiation through INDCs advanced the evolution of differentiation beyond the bifurcation of Annex I and non-Annex I countries. For example, the three country groupings introduced above have cascading priorities and ambitions in adaptation and finance. Such differentiation already appears in the Paris Agreement through “subtle differentiation”: flexible differentiation that is applicable to specific subsets of countries (e.g. the LDCs and SIDS) on certain issues (e.g. adaptation and finance) and procedures (e.g. timelines and reporting).
The bottom-up formulation of INDCs brought many interesting insights about the climate politics and policies of years to come. However, as much as the instrument is universal, the limited guidance on the formulation of INDCs allowed for non-universal INDC content. For example, it is problematic that only the potential recipients included climate finance in their INDCs. Also, the adaptation challenge (e.g in terms of cost estimates and the global goal on adaptation that was decided upon in the Paris Agreement) remains unclear because developed countries did not include adaptation in their INDCs.

We have used our in-depth analysis of the INDCs to create an interactive visualization of countries’ policy priorities and ambitions. You can access the INDC Content Explorer via the Klimalog project page.

Über den Autor

Pauw, Pieter

Umweltwissenschaftler

Pieter Pauw

Weitere Expertinnen/Experten zu diesem Thema

Altenburg, Tilman

Wirtschaftsgeograph 

Bauer, Steffen

Politikwissenschaftler 

Brandi, Clara

Ökonomin und Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Fues, Thomas

Ökonom 

Hein, Jonas

Geograph 

Horstmann, Britta

Geographin 

Mehl, Regine

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Messner, Dirk

Politikwissenschaftler 

Never, Babette

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Pegels, Anna

Ökonomin 

Volz, Ulrich

Ökonom 

Mathis, Okka Lou

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Keil, Jonas

Ökonom 

Hulse, Merran

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Nowack, Daniel

Politikwissenschaftler 

Matias, Denise

Umwelt- und Agrarwissenschaftlerin 

Wehrmann, Dorothea

Soziologin 

Fuhrmann, Hanna

Ökonomin 

Malerba, Daniele

Politikwissenschaftler 

Kuhn, Sascha

Sozialpsychologe 

Aktuelle Publikationen

Pioniere der Nachhaltigkeit für eine globale Transformation

Tatjana Reiber
Die aktuelle Kolumne, 21.08.2017

A review of ecosystem service benefits from wild bees across social contexts

Matias, Denise Margaret / Julia Leventon / Anna-Lena Rau / Christian Borgemeister / Henrik von Wehrden
Externe Publikationen, 16.08.2017

Thinking beyond Western commercial honeybee hives: towards improved conservation of honey bee diversity

Matias, Denise Margaret / Christian Borgemeister / Henrik von Wehrden
Externe Publikationen, 16.08.2017

North Africa: can common security challenges promote regional integration?

Tawfik, Rawia
Externe Publikationen, 07.08.2017