Directing structural change: from tools to policy

Directing structural change: from tools to policy

Download PDF 555 KB

Altenburg, Tilman / Maria Kleinz / Wilfried Lütkenhorst
Discussion Paper 24/2016

Bonn: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)

ISBN: 978-3-96021-018-4
Price: 6 €

Structural change towards diversification and competitiveness is important to make our economies productive, wealthy and sustainable. In market economies, structural change is essentially driven by private entrepreneurs who challenge incumbents with new business ideas and take risks to implement them. While public policy cannot fully anticipate the outcomes of such market-driven search processes, it does have important roles in directing structural change: it can facilitate stakeholder processes meant to overcome coordination and information failure and thereby smooth the transformation; it can make pre-competitive investments in infrastructure and skills for the future; and it can help align structural change with broader societal objectives, such as environmental sustainability or job creation. To fulfil these roles, policymakers need to have an idea about future competitive patterns of specialisation. The challenge is to anticipate trends and facilitate action towards promising futures in ways that are as evidence-based as possible and effectively synchronised with market forces.
Our paper makes three essential contributions to addressing this challenge: (1) We identify five influential methodologies for anticipating future competitive advantages, analyse their strengths and weaknesses, and suggest ways to consolidate their most valu¬able features in one synthetic approach. (2) In doing so, we emphasise the importance of disruptive change, stemming in particular from decarbonisation as well as the digitali¬sation of economic processes and products. Such game changers are likely to affect virtually all economic sectors, thereby reducing the predictive power of methodologies that essentially extrapolate from the past. (3) We highlight the need to contextualise the various analytical tools, and caution against using them as technocratic blueprints. To be of practical use, evidence-based assessments of future competitive advantages need to be embedded into a political economy framework that takes account of both societal objectives (normative level) and implementation capabilities (institutional level).

About the author

Altenburg, Tilman

Economic Geographer

Tilman Altenburg

Further experts

Berger, Axel

Political Scientist 

Brandi, Clara

Economist and Political Scientist 

Hampel-Milagrosa, Aimée

Institutional and Agricultural Economist 

Lindenberg, Nannette

Economist 

Schwab, Jakob

Economist 

Current Publications

National strategies for sustainable development between Rio 1992 and New York 2015

Scholz, Imme
Externe Publikationen of 25 April 2017

Unlocking the irrigation potential in sub-Saharan Africa: are public-private partnerships the way forward?

Scheumann, Waltina / Annabelle Houdret / Michael Brüntrup
Briefing Paper 7/2017

Can gender-targeted employment interventions help enhance community participation? Evidence from urban Togo

Breuer, Anita / Edward Asiedub
Externe Publikationen of 24 April 2017

Klimapolitik und Entwicklung

Hein, Wolfgang / Joachim Betz / Dennis Eucker / Jonas Hein / Lars Holstenkamp / Babette Never
Externe Publikationen of 24 April 2017