A new contract for financing the UN development system: what does it mean and how can it be achieved?

Baumann, Max-Otto / Pratyush Sharma
Externe Publikationen (2017)

in: Financing the UN Development System: pathways to reposition for Agenda 2030, Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation and the United Nations Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (UN MPTFO), 66-69

Volltext/Document

Follow the money’, goes the advice, for understanding any organisation. In the UN development system (UNDS), the bulk of member states’ contributions take a fairly ballistic course: launched with political fanfare, the money is aimed at the narrow landing place of a concrete project or purpose. 77% of development and humanitarian resources were earmarked in this way in 2015, ‘bilateralizing’ and bypassing the UNDS’ multilateral- and valueadding mechanisms. The three largest donors, accounting for 47%, also rely heavily on earmarking, and have thus practically cancelled the contract according to which the UNDS, like any other organistion, is (core-) funded to implement joint global agendas. Emerging donors are adapting the same transactional funding pattern for their South-South Cooperation.

About the author

Baumann, Max-Otto

Political Scientist

Max-Otto Baumann

Further experts

Bauer, Steffen

Political scientist 

Berensmann, Kathrin

Economist 

Blankenbach, Johannes

Political Scientist 

Dafe, Florence

Social Scientist 

Hackenesch, Christine

Political Scientist 

Janus, Heiner

Political Scientist 

Keijzer, Niels

Social Scientist 

Lindenberg, Nannette

Economist 

Loewe, Markus

Economist 

Richerzhagen, Carmen

Agricultural and Environmental Economist 

Rippin, Nicole

Economist 

Scholz, Imme

Sociologist 

Wolff, Peter

Economist 

Hilbrich, Sören

Economist 

Janetschek, Hannah

Political Scientist 

Wehrmann, Dorothea

Sociologist 

Contact

Cornelia Hornschild (Publication Office)
Andrea Ueding (Library and Publications / Inquiries)