Monitoring and evaluation in South-South Cooperation: the case of CPEC in Pakistan

Monitoring and evaluation in South-South Cooperation: the case of CPEC in Pakistan

Download PDF 856 KB

Ali, Murad
Discussion Paper 1/2018

Bonn: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)

ISBN: 978-3-96021-058-0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23661/dp1.2018
Preis: 6 €

Pakistan is one of the key countries in China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) where the latter is implementing a multibillion-dollar, multiyear investment plan known as the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). A collection of projects aimed at developing energy, industry and communication infrastructure, costing over USD 46 billion, CPEC is expected to contribute significantly to socio-economic development and poverty reduction in Pakistan. The main research question is, while implementing development projects in Pakistan, to what extent China adheres to its avowed principles of international development cooperation comprising features such as mutual respect, non-conditionality, equality, building local capacity and addressing actual needs of partner countries. Based mainly on the analysis of primary data collected during fieldwork in Pakistan, this research explores the extent to which the official narrative guides and influences the actual practice of China’s development cooperation on the ground. Although still evolving, the BRI and its constituent the CPEC, which is an investment-grant-loan model of financing in Pakistan, is an example of South-South Cooperation (SSC): the form of international development cooperation whereby “two or more developing countries pursue their individual or collective development through cooperative exchange of knowledge, skills, resources and technical expertise” (UNDP, 2007, p. 1). For the analysis of CPEC-related Chinese investment in Pakistan, this study uses an analytical framework developed by researchers from the South Africa chapter of the Network of Southern Think Tanks (NeST), a group of key research institutions from various developing countries dedicated to generating standardised, systematic and clearly comparable knowledge on SSC (Besharati & Rawhani, 2016; Besharati, Rawhani, & Rios, 2017). Established in 2015, and then refined and finalised in 2017 after a number of expert group meetings and field-based SSC case studies, the framework operationalises various conceptual issues related to the quality and development effectiveness of SSC. The framework, which is discussed later in some detail, comprises five dimensions and a set of 20 indicators. The overall framework and associated dimensions and indicators not only offer valuable parameters to assess the quality and effectiveness of SSC, but these are also closely related to the key principles and features of China’s foreign aid policy. The five key elements of the analytical framework are inclusive national ownership, horizontality, self-reliance and sustainability, accountability and transparency and development efficiency. Within this framework and associated parameters, this research examines the China-Pakistan development partnership under CPEC and explores the extent to which SSC principles are practiced. By systematically examining SSC in the form of Chinese investment and development cooperation projects in Pakistan, this study contributes to the limited body of academic literature on Chinese development cooperation with its key South Asian ally.

Weitere Expert*innen zu diesem Thema

Berensmann, Kathrin

Wirtschaftswissenschaften 

Berger, Axel

Politikwissenschaft 

Brandi, Clara

Ökonomie und Politikwissenschaft 

Droste, Leonie Marie

Politikwissenschaft 

Fasold, Maximilian

Politische Ökonomie 

Gitt, Florian

Ökonomie 

Grimm, Sven

Politologie 

Götze, Jacqueline

Politikwissenschaft 

Haldenwang, Christian von

Politikwissenschaftler 

Haug, Sebastian

Politikwissenschaft 

Hägele, Ramona

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Janus, Heiner

Politikwissenschaft 

Keijzer, Niels

Sozialwissenschaft 

Klingebiel, Stephan

Politikwissenschaft 

Koch, Svea

Sozialwissenschaft 

Mathis, Okka Lou

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Olekseyuk, Zoryana

Ökonomie 

Reiners, Wulf

Politikwissenschaft 

Röthel, Tim

Ökonomie 

Schiller, Armin von

Politikwissenschaftler 

Schwachula, Anna

Soziologie 

Sommer, Christoph

Ökonom 

Srigiri, Srinivasa Reddy

Agrarökonom 

Stender, Frederik

Ökonom 

Strupat, Christoph

Ökonom 

Vogel, Johanna

Kulturwirtschaft 

Vogel, Tim

Ökonomie 

von Haaren, Paula

Entwicklungsökonomie 

Walle, Yabibal

Entwicklungsökonomie 

Wehrmann, Dorothea

Soziologie 

Wisskirchen, Alma

Politikwissenschaft