Data for development: an agenda for German development cooperation

Data for development: an agenda for German development cooperation

Download PDF 1.2 MB

Schwegmann, Claudia / Sarah Holzapfel
Briefing Paper 12/2018

Bonn: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)

DOI: 10.23661/bp12.2018

Data is a central but underestimated prerequisite for the realisation of the 2030 Agenda. Although technical innovations such as smartphones or the internet of things have led to a data explosion in recent years, there are still considerable gaps in the availability and use of data in developing countries and development cooperation (DC) in particular. So far it is not possible to report regularly on the majority of the 230 indicators of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Already in 2014 an independent panel of experts, called for nothing less than a data revolution to support the implementation of the SDGs in their 2014 report to the UN Secretary-General, A World that Counts. Data is one of the key requirements for planning, managing and evaluating development projects and strategies. The aim of the data revolution for sustainable development is 1) to close data gaps with the aid of new technologies and additional resources, 2) to strengthen global data literacy, promote data use and enable equality of access, 3) to create a “data ecosystem” that follows global standards in order to improve data quality, enable data aggregation and prevent abuse.
The data revolution for sustainable development is a challenge for all countries. There is a lot of room for improvement in both partner countries and all areas of German policy making. This paper focuses on German DC.
Overall, the subject of data has to date received little attention in the organisations of German DC and their projects. The demand for evidence- and data-based work is often limited to evaluation.
A results framework to support portfolio management in German DC does not exist. Monitoring at project level is often not sufficient, as data quality is frequently poor and capacity is lacking. In the partner countries the implementing organisations (IOs) often introduce parallel structures for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) in order to keep track of the measures implemented, instead of using and strengthening national statistical systems as much as possible. Collected data and project progress reports are usually not published.
The following recommendations can be derived from the analysis:

  • German DC should agree on common data standards and principles for data use, such as Open Data by Default. At the same time, personal rights should also be ensured.

  • The Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) should work with all German DC actors (other ministries, IOs, non-state actors) to develop a data strategy that takes into account the different data sources and types, builds upon common standards and principles and aims to promote a data culture in all areas of German DC.
  • At international level the German government should take an active role in the realisation and further development of the Cape Town Global Action Plan for Sustainable Development Data.
  • Germany should increase its financial contribution to the development of data and statistics in partner countries, stop the use of parallel M&E systems in the medium term and promote the support of national statistical systems in all DC measures.



Über die Autorin

Holzapfel, Sarah

Agrarökonomin

Holzapfel

Weitere Expertinnen/Experten zu diesem Thema

Scholz, Imme

Soziologin 

Janus, Heiner

Politikwissenschaftler 

Keijzer, Niels

Sozialwissenschaftler 

Klingebiel, Stephan

Politikwissenschaftler 

Koch, Svea

Sozialwissenschaftlerin 

Mehl, Regine

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Negre, Mario

Ökonom 

Rippin, Nicole

Ökonomin 

Weinlich, Silke

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Kloke-Lesch, Adolf

Stadt- und Regionalplaner 

Funk, Evelyn

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Groß, Lisa

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Janetschek, Hannah

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Marschall, Paul

Ökonom 

Mathis, Okka Lou

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Oehler, Hannes

Ökonom 

Scholtes, Fabian

Ökonom 

Schwachula, Anna

Soziologin 

Strupat, Christoph

Ökonom 

Vogel, Johanna

Kulturwirtin 

Wehrmann, Dorothea

Soziologin 

Iacobuta, Gabriela

Umweltwissenschaftlerin