The COVID-19 pandemic and structural transformation in Africa: evidence for action

The COVID-19 pandemic and structural transformation in Africa: evidence for action

Download PDF 2,29 MB

Leininger, Julia / Christoph Strupat / Yonas Adeto / Abebe Shimeles / Wilson Wasike
Discussion Paper 11/2021

Bonn: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)

ISBN: 978-3-96021-148-8
DOI: 10.23661/dp11.2021
Preis: 6 €

This study analyses how strengths and weaknesses of economic, societal, political and environmental structures played out during the Covid-19 crisis in Africa since March 2020. Its main aim is to improve evidence on the direct and indirect effects of the pandemic on African countries and, based on that evidence, identify policy implications and formulate recommendations. It comprises the analysis of (a) direct impacts of the pandemic as well as of policy responses such as lockdowns and their potential determinants; (b) indirect effects of lockdowns and policy responses to the pandemic on economic, social, political and environmental domains in the light of structural strengths and weaknesses of African countries. In general, the study is based on the assumption that economic and other structures determine the magnitude and direction of the pandemic’s impact on the short and long run. Its added value is the thematic comprehensiveness and the comparative analysis of country clusters. Amongst many other findings, the analysis shows the important role of social cohesion for coping with the pandemic and for sustainable development on the longer run. This implies the need for (a) material and immaterial investments in good and trustful relationships within societies and between society and the state; (b) incentives for increasing cooperation of individuals for a common good need to be at the core of future development strategies. It identifies a trias of political priorities, which are all equally important and relate to each other. They contain (a) inclusive and green economic development that must be linked to (b) the establishment and improvement of universal social systems (health, education, social protection in case of poverty, old age and unemployment) as well as (c) a redesign of political institutions that are capable and inclusive to collect revenues and provide public goods. (d) None of these policy priorities will be effective on the long run without saving ecosystems.

Über die Autor*innen

Berger, Axel

Politikwissenschaft

Berger

Brandi, Clara

Ökonomie und Politikwissenschaft

Brandi

Brüntrup, Michael

Agrarökonomie

Brüntrup

Burchi, Francesco

Entwicklungsökonomie

Burchi

Hackenesch, Christine

Politikwissenschaft

Hackenesch

Houdret, Annabelle

Politikwissenschaftlerin

Houdret

Leininger, Julia

Politikwissenschaftlerin

Leininger

Schiller, Armin von

Politikwissenschaftler

Schiller

Ziaja, Sebastian

Politikwissenschaftler

Ziaja

Dick, Eva

Soziologin und Raumplanerin

Dick

El-Haddad, Amirah

Ökonomie

El-Haddad

Fiedler, Charlotte

Politikwissenschaftlerin

Fiedler

Marschall, Paul

Ökonomie

Marschall

Mross, Karina

Politikwissenschaftlerin

Mross

Schraven, Benjamin

Politikwissenschaftler

Schraven
Strupat

Malerba, Daniele

Ökonomie

Malerba

Aleksandrova, Mariya

Climate risk governance

Aleksandrova

Lehmann, Ina

Politikwissenschaft

Lehmann

Weitere Expert*innen zu diesem Thema

Balasubramanian, Pooja

Sozioökonomie 

Nowack, Daniel

Politikwissenschaftler 

Roll, Michael

Soziologie 

Sakketa, Tekalign Gutu

Agrarökonomie 

Zintl, Tina

Politikwissenschaftlerin