Risks of maladaptation: climate insurance in agriculture

Risks of maladaptation: climate insurance in agriculture

Download PDF 1.3 MB

Müller, Birgit / Leigh Johnson / David Kreuer
Briefing Paper 22/2017

Bonn: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)

Weather risk is an issue of extraordinary concern in the face of climate change, not least for rural agricultural households in developing countries. Governments and international donors currently promote ‘climate insurance’, financial mechanisms that make payouts following extreme weather events. Technologically innovative insurance programmes are heralded as promising strategies for decreasing poverty and improving resilience in countries that are heavily dependent on smallholder agriculture. New subsidies will amount to hundreds of millions of dollars, yet funders and advocates have thus far neglected the social and ecological ramifications of these policies. Reviews have focused largely on near-term economic effects and practical challenges.

This briefing draws on an initial inventory of potential adverse effects of insurance programmes on local agricultural systems that we have recently assembled. Our review shows that farmers with insurance may alter their land-use strategies or their involvement in social networks previously used to mitigate climate risk. Both processes constitute crucial feedbacks on the environmental and the social systems respectively.

Based on our study, we suggest preliminary principles for avoiding maladaptive outcomes, including recommenda­tions for designing appropriate impact studies and in­surance programmes. Before implementation, pilot projects should assess existing local risk-management strategies, financial instruments, and extant state agricultural and social protection policies. Participatory processes should be designed to anticipate and appraise potential effects of insurance – including those resulting from changing land use – and interactions with existing public policies.

Several recommendations for improvements to the elabora­tion and design of future agricultural insurance programmes follow from our analysis:

1.         Evaluate priorities

2.         Encourage diversity

3.         Adapt policies

4.         Choose the right scale

5.         Limit coverage to extremes

6.         Tie insurance to ecologically sound strategies

Current and future ‘climate insurance’ projects should be combined with consciously designed programmes to invest in and foster farmer-led learning on sustainable agricultural techniques. Policies linking insurance coverage and subsidies to diversified and ecologically sensitive cultivation may provide new frameworks for the design of insurance programmes in developing countries. This also requires rethinking the accepted wisdom on bundling insurance with inputs, which may make social-ecological systems and smallholders more fragile and vulnerable in the face of a changing climate.

Further experts

Berensmann, Kathrin

Economist 

Dafe, Florence

Social Scientist 

Dombrowsky, Ines

Economist 

Horstmann, Britta

Geographer 

Lindenberg, Nannette

Economist 

Pauw, Pieter

Environment Scientist 

Scholz, Imme

Sociologist 

Wolff, Peter

Economist 

Current Publications

When and how can foreign aid slow migration?

Martin-Shields, Charles / Steffen Angenendt / Benjamin Schraven
Externe Publikationen of 14 December 2017

Die ökonomischen Auswirkungen von EU-Freihandelsabkommen auf Entwicklungsländer

Brandi, Clara
Externe Publikationen of 14 December 2017

Peacekeeping's digital economy: the role of communication technologies in post-conflict economic growth

Martin-Shields, Charles P. / Nicholas Bodanac
Externe Publikationen of 14 December 2017

Pension schemes in MENA: generous—but not to the poor!

Loewe, Markus
Externe Publikationen of 13 December 2017

The European Fund for Sustainable Development: changing the game?

Lundsgaarde, Erik
Discussion Paper 29/2017