Green industrial policy: managing transformation under uncertainty

Green industrial policy: managing transformation under uncertainty

Download PDF 874 KB

Lütkenhorst, Wilfried / Tilman Altenburg / Anna Pegels / Georgeta Vidican
Discussion Paper 28/2014

Bonn: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)

ISBN: 978-3-88985-653-1
Price: 6 €

This Discussion Paper presents a normative concept of green industrial policy, which is defined as encompassing any policy measure aimed at aligning the structure of a country’s economy with the needs of sustainable development within established planetary boundaries. The paper elaborates on the rationale of a green industrial policy, how it differs from conventional industrial policy, why it is faced with significantly bigger challenges, and how these can be met.

Production and consumption patterns today are largely shaped by markets. However, markets fail to solve many of the environmental challenges the world is facing. Therefore, governments have to intervene, thus reclaiming the primacy of public policy in setting and implementing societal objectives. While safeguarding the sustainability of human life on our planet makes green industrial policy a highly normative undertaking, there is also a strong economic case for green industrial policy – the success stories of such ‘green’ frontrunners as Germany and Denmark demonstrate the competitiveness potential of the new technologies. However, as shown by decades of discussion on industrial policy, government intervention almost invariably brings about risks of political capture and government failure. Green industrial policy is thus not only governed by ethical norms, but also by politics.

The risks of failure are magnified by the urgency and scale of today’s global environmental challenges, requiring particularly bold, comprehensive and well-orchestrated government intervention under high uncertainty. By highlighting lessons learned from practical cases of both success and failure, this paper shows how these risks can be, and have been, managed. This involves both the disruption of old pathways (with locked-in technologies and infrastructure as well as stranded assets) and the creation of new pathways responding to sustainability imperatives. The paper argues that a broad-based social vision needs to be forged – supported by change coalitions and coupled with policy process safeguards, openness to policy learning, and an alignment of green industrial policies with market mechanisms.

About the authors

Altenburg, Tilman

Economic Geographer

Tilman Altenburg

Pegels, Anna

Economist

Anna Pegels
Georgeta Auktor (ehemals Vidican)

Further experts

Bauer, Steffen

Political scientist 

Brandi, Clara

Economist and Political Scientist 

Breuer, Anita

Political Scientist 

Haldenwang, Christian von

Political Scientist 

Hein, Jonas

Geographer 

Horstmann, Britta

Geographer 

Houdret, Annabelle

Political Scientist 

Koch, Svea

Social Scientist 

Leininger, Julia

Political Scientist 

Mehl, Regine

Political Scientist 

Messner, Dirk

Political Scientist 

Never, Babette

Political Scientist 

Pauw, Pieter

Environment Scientist 

Current Publications

North Africa: can common security challenges promote regional integration?

Tawfik, Rawia
Externe Publikationen of 07 August 2017

GERD and hydro-politics in the Eastern Nile: from water to benefit-sharing?

Tawfik, Rawia / Ines Dombrowsky
Externe Publikationen of 07 August 2017

Klima-Wandel im Gipfeljahr 2015

Messner, Dirk
Externe Publikationen of 01 August 2017

Islamism as a social movement: 'Jihadism is comparable to Stalinism' - Interview

Messner, Dirk
Externe Publikationen of 01 August 2017