Conflict and continuity in European diplomatic cultures: accountability, scrutiny and control in EU external affairs

Henökl, Thomas
Externe Publikationen (2016)

in: International Relations and Diplomacy 4 (5), 324-340 DOI:10.17265/2328-2134/2016.05.002


Under the Lisbon Treaty, the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs (HRVP) has obtained far-reaching powers to formulate, coordinate and implement ÉU external policies, traditionally a prerogative of the state. In the exercise of this delegated powers, the HRVP is assisted by a dedicated administrative body, the European External Action Service (EEAS). Formal decision-making over the EU‘s common foreign and security policy lies with the Council, while the European Neighborhood and Trade policies, as well as international cooperation remain competences of the EU-Commission. Concomitantly, the EEAS is situated within several, partly overlapping and conflicting accountability relationships. The ensuing question is: To what extent, how and by whom can the HRVP and the EEAS be held politically to account? With data from official documents, 50 semi-structured interviews and a survey among 184 EU foreign policy-makers, the article maps and assesses of the multi-level actor/forum relationships of the EU's foreign policy machinery.

Further experts

Furness, Mark

Political Scientist 

Grimm, Sven

Political Scientist 

Hackenesch, Christine

Political Scientist 

Keijzer, Niels

Social Scientist 

Koch, Svea

Social Scientist 

Weinlich, Silke

Political Scientist 

Kloke-Lesch, Adolf

Urban and regional planner 

Bergmann, Julian

Political Scientist 

Marschall, Paul


Scholtes, Fabian


Schöfberger, Irene

Human geographer 

Stauber, Verena

Social Scientiest