Constellations of fragility: an empirical typology of states

Ziaja, Sebastian / Jörn Grävingholt / Merle Kreibaum
Externe Publikationen (2019)

in: Studies in Comparative International Development 54 (2), 299-321

DOI: 10.1007/s12116-019-09284-3
Volltext/Document

We present a typology of states that distinguishes constellations of state fragility based on empirical patterns. State fragility is here defined as deficiencies in one or more of three core functions of the state. These functions include violence control, implementation capacity, and empirical legitimacy. Violence control refers to the state’s ability to manage the uses of violence within society. Implementation capacity refers to the state’s ability to provide basic public services. Empirical legitimacy refers to the population’s consent to the state’s claim to rule. Employing three to four indicators per dimension for 171 countries over the period 2005–2015 and finite mixture model clustering, we find six dominant constellations that represent different types of state dysfunctionality.

About the authors

Grävingholt, Jörn

Political Scientist

Grävingholt

Ziaja, Sebastian

Political Scientist

Ziaja

Further experts

Baumann, Max-Otto

Political Scientist 

Dick, Eva

Sociologist and Spatial Planner 

El-Haddad, Amirah

Economist 

Nowack, Daniel

Political Scientist 

Kaplan, Lennart

Economist 

Fiedler, Charlotte

Political Scientist 

Martin-Shields, Charles

Political Scientist 

Mross, Karina

Political Scientist 

Breuer, Anita

Political Scientist 

Erforth, Benedikt

Political Scientist 

Furness, Mark

Political Scientist 

Haldenwang, Christian von

Political Scientist 

Houdret, Annabelle

Political Scientist 

Kuhnt, Jana

Development Economist 

Leininger, Julia

Political Scientist 

Mehl, Regine

Political Scientist 

Reiners, Wulf

Political Scientist 

Roll, Michael

Sociologist