It’s domestic politics, stupid! EU democracy promotion strategies meet African dominant party regimes

Hackenesch, Christine
External Publications (2015)

in: World Development 75/2015 (Special Issue: Political Conditionality and EU Foreign Aid), 85–96

Volltext/Document

Dominant party systems trigger controversy about how the EU should engage with them. The examples of Ethiopia and Rwanda show that the willingness of authoritarian governments to engage with the EU on democratic reforms varies widely. The paper argues that the type of challenge to regime survival that authoritarian governments face affects both their coercive strategies and their openness to engaging with the EU, giving the EU different entry points to support reforms. Yet, due to EU domestic factors and difficulties with ‘reading’ authoritarian regimes’ logic of political survival, the EU has problems making use of this dynamic.

About the author

Hackenesch, Christine

Political Science

Hackenesch

Further experts

Bergmann, Julian

Political Science 

Breuer, Anita

Political Scientist 

Burni, Aline

Political Science 

Erforth, Benedikt

Political Science 

Fiedler, Charlotte

Political Scientist 

Friesen, Ina

Political Science 

Furness, Mark

Political Science 

Grimm, Sven

Political Science 

Grävingholt, Jörn

Political Scientist 

Högl, Maximilian

Political Science 

Keijzer, Niels

Social Science 

Kloke-Lesch, Adolf

Urban and regional planner 

Koch, Svea

Social Science 

Leininger, Julia

Political Scientist 

Marschall, Paul

Economy 

Mross, Karina

Political Scientist 

Scholtes, Fabian

Economist 

Trautner, Bernhard

Political Scientist 

Weinlich, Silke

Political Science 

Ziaja, Sebastian

Political Scientist