Same table, different menus? A comparison of UN and EU mediation practice in the Kosovo-Serbia conflict

Bergmann, Julian
Externe Publikationen (2018)

in: International Negotiation 23 (2), 238-257

DOI: 10.1163/15718069-23021156
Information

This article compares UN and EU mediation practice in the Kosovo-Serbia conflict. It proposes a conceptual framework to analyze mediation effectiveness and its conditions and applies it to the UN-led Kosovo Status Talks in Vienna (2006–2007) and the ongoing EU-facilitated dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina (since 2011). The EU’s relatively high degree of effectiveness compared to the UN effort can be partly explained by the application of a strategy of "manipulation", drawing on the EU’s strong leverage vis-à-vis both sides; partly by pointing to the conflict context which has been more favorable to mediation since 2011. At the same time, the analysis reveals that EU mediation has not led to any changes concerning Serbia’s stance toward the recognition of Kosovo’s independence. The continuing non-resolution of the conflict demonstrates the limits of the EU’s mediation approach and points to a substantial dilemma of EU mediation.

Über die Autoren

Bergmann, Julian

Political Scientist

Bergmann

Further experts

Fiedler, Charlotte

Political Scientist 

Martin-Shields, Charles

Political Scientist 

Mross, Karina

Political Scientist 

Ziaja, Sebastian

Political Scientist 

Marschall, Paul

Economist 

Scholtes, Fabian

Economist 

Weinlich, Silke

Political Scientist 

Kloke-Lesch, Adolf

Urban and regional planner 

Burni, Aline

Political Scientist 

Erforth, Benedikt

Political Scientist 

Furness, Mark

Political Scientist 

Grimm, Sven

Political Scientist 

Grävingholt, Jörn

Political Scientist 

Hackenesch, Christine

Political Scientist 

Högl, Maximilian

Political Scientist 

Keijzer, Niels

Social Scientist 

Koch, Svea

Social Scientist 

Kuhnt, Jana

Development Economist