TTIP and investment protection: reason for failure or impetus for reform?

Berger, Axel
Externe Publikationen (2015)

published on Cato Online Forum October 2015

Volltext/Document

Emerging from relative obscurity, the issue of investment protection has become the main bone of contention in the increasingly heated debate about the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Critics argue that investment treaties typically grant foreign investors more extensive rights than are afforded domestic investors, including the right to bypass host-country legal systems and bring ISDS cases against their host-country governments. Meanwhile, proponents of treaty-based investment protection and arbitration have had difficulty alleviating the public’s concerns. This essay addresses three common arguments put forward to support the idea of including investment disciplines in the TTIP.

About the author

Berger, Axel

Political Scientist

Berger

Further experts

Brandi, Clara

Economist and Political Scientist 

Mehl, Regine

Political Scientist 

Volz, Ulrich

Economist 

Hulse, Merran

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Nowack, Daniel

Political Scientist 

Olekseyuk, Zoryana

Economist 

Schwab, Jakob

Economist 

Vogel, Johanna

International Cultural Economist 

Wehrmann, Dorothea

Sociologist 

Reiners, Wulf

Political Scientist 

Gonsior, Victoria

Economist 

Weinreich, Jan

Politikwissenschaft