Promises and risks of nonstate action in climate and sustainability governance

Chan, Sander / Idil Boran / Harro van Asselt / Gabriela Iacobuta / Navam Niles / Katharine Rietig / Michelle Scobie / Jennifer S. Bansard / Deborah Delgado Pugley / Laurence L. Delina / Friederike Eichhorn / Paula Ellinger / Okechukwu Enechi / Thomas Hale / Lukas Hermwille / Thomas Hickmann / Matthias Honegger / Andrea Hurtado Epstein / Stephanie La Hoz Theuer / Robert Mizo / Yixian Sun / Patrick Toussaint / Geoffrey Wambugu
Externe Publikationen (2019)

published on Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: climate change 03 January 2019

DOI: 10.1002/wcc.572

Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement stand as milestone diplomatic achievements. However, immense discrepancies between political commitments and governmental action remain. Combined national climate commitments fall far short of the Paris Agreement's 1.5/2°C targets. Similar political ambition gaps persist across various areas of sustainable development. Many therefore argue that actions by nonstate actors, such as businesses and investors, cities and regions, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), are crucial. These voices have resonated across the United Nations (UN) system, leading to growing recognition, promotion, and mobilization of such actions in ever greater numbers. This article investigates optimistic arguments about nonstate engagement, namely: (a) “the more the better”; (b) “everybody wins”; (c) “everyone does their part”; and (d) “more brings more.” However, these optimistic arguments may not be matched in practice due to governance risks. The current emphasis on quantifiable impacts may lead to the under‐appreciation of variegated social, economic, and environmental impacts. Claims that everybody stands to benefit may easily be contradicted by outcomes that are not in line with priorities and needs in developing countries. Despite the seeming depoliticization of the role of nonstate actors in implementation, actions may still lead to politically contentious outcomes. Finally, nonstate climate and sustainability actions may not be self‐reinforcing but may heavily depend on supporting mechanisms. The article concludes with governance risk‐reduction strategies that can be combined to maximize nonstate potential in sustainable and climate‐resilient transformations.

About the authors

Chan, Sander

Enviroment Policy


Iacobuta, Gabriela

Environmental Researcher

Further experts

Breuer, Anita

Political Scientist 

Haldenwang, Christian von

Political Scientist 

Houdret, Annabelle

Political Scientist 

Leininger, Julia

Political Scientist 

Mehl, Regine

Political Scientist 

Volz, Ulrich


Baumann, Max-Otto

Political Scientist 

Dick, Eva

Sociologist and Spatial Planner 

El-Haddad, Amirah


Hulse, Merran


Nowack, Daniel

Political Scientist 

Olekseyuk, Zoryana


Vogel, Johanna

International Cultural Economist 

Wehrmann, Dorothea


Reiners, Wulf

Political Scientist 

Gonsior, Victoria


Weinreich, Jan


Kaplan, Lennart