Sub- and non-state climate action: a framework to assess progress, implementation and impact

Hale, Thomas .N. / Sander Chan / Angel Hsu / Andrew Clapper / Cynthia Elliott / Pedro Faria / Takeshi Kuramochi / Shannon McDaniel / Milimer Morgado / Mark Roelfsema / Mayra Santaella / Neelam Singh / Ian Tout / Chris Weber / Amy Weinfurter / Oscar Widerberg
Externe Publikationen (2020)

in: Climate Policy, 1-15 (online first)

DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1828796
Information

The rising importance of cities, states and regions, firms, investors, and other subnational and non-state actors in global and national responses to climate change raises a critical question: to what extent does this climate action deliver results? This article introduces a conceptual framework that researchers and practitioners can use as a template to assess the progress, implementation, and impact of climate action by sub- and non-state actors. This framework is used to review existing studies that track progress, implementation, and achievement of such climate action between 2014 and mid-2019. While researchers have made important advances in assessing the scope and future potential of sub- and non-state climate action, we find knowledge gaps around ex-post achievement of results, indirect impacts, and climate action beyond the realm of greenhouse gas reductions.
Key policy insights
• While we increasingly understand the scale, scope, and potential of climate action by sub- and non-state actors, we lack rigorous evidence regarding the results achieved and their broader impacts.
• More information on progress and impact is essential for the credibility of sub- and non-state climate action. Policymakers need to understand which approaches are working and which are not, promoting the diffusion of best practice and creating conditions for stronger action in the future.
• The proposed conceptual framework can be tailored and applied to a wide range of initiatives that target mitigation, adaptation, and other spheres of climate action. By providing a template to identify key elements of progress tracking and evaluation, the framework can help align both research and practitioner communities around the data and metrics required to understand the overall impact of climate action.

Über den Autor

Chan, Sander

Umweltpolitik

Chan

Weitere Expert*innen zu diesem Thema

Aleksandrova, Mariya

Climate risk governance 

Bauer, Steffen

Politikwissenschaftler 

Brandi, Clara

Ökonomie und Politikwissenschaft 

Brehm, Johannes

Ökonomie 

Breuer, Anita

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Dippel, Beatrice

Komparatistik 

El-Haddad, Amirah

Ökonomie 

Haldenwang, Christian von

Politikwissenschaftler 

Herrfahrdt-Pähle, Elke

Volkswirtin 

Houdret, Annabelle

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Hägele, Ramona

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Iacobuta, Gabriela

Umweltwissenschaftlerin 

Kunz, Yvonne

Geographie 

Lehmann, Ina

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Leininger, Julia

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Malerba, Daniele

Ökonomie 

Mathis, Okka Lou

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Müngersdorff, Maximilian

Sozialwissenschaftler 

Rodríguez de Francisco, Jean Carlo

Umweltwissenschaftler 

Roll, Michael

Soziologe 

Schoderer, Mirja

Umweltwissenschaftlerin 

Schraven, Benjamin

Politikwissenschaftler 

Srigiri, Srinivasa Reddy

Agrarökonom 

Stoffel, Tim

Politikwissenschaftler 

Trautner, Bernhard

Politikwissenschaft 

Wehrmann, Dorothea

Soziologie