Promises and risks of nonstate action in climate and sustainability governance

Chan, Sander / Idil Boran / Harro van Asselt / Gabriela Iacobuta / Navam Niles / Katharine Rietig / Michelle Scobie / Jennifer S. Bansard / Deborah Delgado Pugley / Laurence L. Delina / Friederike Eichhorn / Paula Ellinger / Okechukwu Enechi / Thomas Hale
Externe Publikationen (2019)

published on Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: climate change 03 January 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.572
Information

Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement stand as milestone diplomatic achievements. However, immense discrepancies between political commitments and governmental action remain. Combined national climate commitments fall far short of the Paris Agreement's 1.5/2°C targets. Similar political ambition gaps persist across various areas of sustainable development. Many therefore argue that actions by nonstate actors, such as businesses and investors, cities and regions, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), are crucial. These voices have resonated across the United Nations (UN) system, leading to growing recognition, promotion, and mobilization of such actions in ever greater numbers. This article investigates optimistic arguments about nonstate engagement, namely: (a) “the more the better”; (b) “everybody wins”; (c) “everyone does their part”; and (d) “more brings more.” However, these optimistic arguments may not be matched in practice due to governance risks. The current emphasis on quantifiable impacts may lead to the under‐appreciation of variegated social, economic, and environmental impacts. Claims that everybody stands to benefit may easily be contradicted by outcomes that are not in line with priorities and needs in developing countries. Despite the seeming depoliticization of the role of nonstate actors in implementation, actions may still lead to politically contentious outcomes. Finally, nonstate climate and sustainability actions may not be self‐reinforcing but may heavily depend on supporting mechanisms. The article concludes with governance risk‐reduction strategies that can be combined to maximize nonstate potential in sustainable and climate‐resilient transformations.

Über die Autor*innen

Iacobuta, Gabriela

Climate and sustainable development policy

Iacobuta

Chan, Sander

Transnationale und internationale Umweltpolitik und Governance

Chan

Weitere Expert*innen zu diesem Thema

Baumann, Max-Otto

Politikwissenschaft 

Berger, Axel

Politikwissenschaft 

Breuer, Anita

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

El-Haddad, Amirah

Ökonomie 

Fasold, Maximilian

Politische Ökonomie 

Gitt, Florian

Ökonomie 

Goedeking, Nicholas

Vergleichende politische Ökonomie 

Haldenwang, Christian von

Politikwissenschaftler 

Haug, Sebastian

Politikwissenschaft 

Herrfahrdt-Pähle, Elke

Volkswirtin 

Hilbrich, Sören

Ökonomie 

Houdret, Annabelle

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Inacio da Cunha, Marcelo

Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Geographie 

Kachelmann, Matthias

Politikwissenschaft 

Leininger, Julia

Politikwissenschaftlerin 

Li, Hangwei

Politikwissenschaft 

Morare, Ditebogo Modiegi

Politikwissenschaften 

Novoselova, Anna

Politikwissenschaften 

Roll, Michael

Soziologie 

Schoderer, Mirja

Umweltwissenschaft 

Stewart, Benjamin

Sozialwissenschaft 

Wehrmann, Dorothea

Soziologie 

Wingens, Christopher

Politikwissenschaftler